FPP Interview: Max S. Gordon

thumbnail_max pic2018 will be the third year essayist and performer Max S. Gordon will read at First Person Plural’s post-election reading “What Just Happened? Writers Respond to Our American Crises”. Gordon does this gorgeously and candidly as he weaves personal history with his current observations, pop culture with the pure love of the dogs in this life. In this essay Gordon makes the case of white supremacy as addiction, remember Jonestown and what it was not, and shares what gives him hope. Hear him read this Sunday, November 18th from 6-8pm at Silvana in Harlem with Ibrahim Abdul-Matin, Judith Baumel, Tanya Domi, Ruby Shamir, Vanessa K. Valdés, and Ricardo Hernandez!

Tell us about 2018, and how you’ve coped and resisted the past two years, the past 40 yearsWhen I spoke at this event last year, I outed myself as an addict.  2018 marks my fifteenth year in recovery from alcoholism.  I say this with some pride because, with loving support, I’ve stayed the course, but I say it also with great humility: any addict that wants to keep her recovery knows that you really are just one day away from taking a drink, and that day is today.   I’ve met women and men who have fifty years of sobriety, and while that number sounds great on paper, the successful ones know that it is staying sober today that matters.  And also knowing when to ask for help.

I offer this here because I think alcoholism is a good way to approach the phenomenon of Donald Trump.  As a politician he is an anomaly, so I find it hard to locate him in the history books.  He makes much more sense to me when I view him from what I know about my own alcoholism, and having survived alcoholism in my family.

Addiction is a fascinating teacher, and one of the things I appreciate most about addiction is its relationship to whiteness. We are living in a time in which whiteness has run amok, and I’m not referring only to specific white people, but to whiteness as a societal construct.  Addiction is one of the last things left in our culture that is almost completely egalitarian when it comes to whiteness.  I’m not talking about the drug trade, or communities at risk, or access to expensive rehabs: I’m talking about that beautiful moment when an addict, black or white, is brought to his knees, and says, “I’m really fucked up, y’all.  I need some help.”

I’ve written about this before: go to an AA meeting in New York City and you will see the woman who lives in a shelter or a halfway house sitting next to the guy who lives in a penthouse.  At the same meeting. And they both have ten days away from drugs and alcohol, they are both struggling to get through the remainder of the day without a drink.  In our history, too often whiteness has given one a pass. But try telling Addiction, “I couldn’t possibly be an addict, Darling, I’m white.” It will look at you as if you’re crazy.  People show Addiction their resumé as if it meant something.  Addiction nods and says, “Really, Harvard Law School, Summa Cum Laude, amazing”, and you still find yourself in jail from a DUI, your marriage over, your career in tatters, your wig completely snatched.  Addiction doesn’t give a fuck what color you are, it smashes white and black lives.  And when your life is broken in two, it is devastating, but it can also be a wonderful entry point.  You may finally face your own silence; you may be ready to listen.

What I’m talking about again is humility, completely absent in this current White House.  There is a tradition in 12-step recovery: “Principles before Personalities”.  I understand that to mean that, even if we disagree with each other or see each other first through our differences – black, white, straight, gay, rich, poor, whatever – we know we are ultimately dedicated to the principles we all need to save our lives.  It’s spiritually very high, that concept, because at its core it says that we are not going to let our personal bullshit get in the way of our ability to learn from each other. We are committed to keeping our ecosystem intact because we both need it to survive.

This has global implications.  It’s a beautiful affirmation to avoid war.  We may be from different cultures, different nations, but I’m not going to put something into the world which will harm you because ultimately I know it will harm me.  But what we have now is the opposite, a society that has become more and more isolationist, based on Personalities before Principles.  That’s what reality-TV culture is, and what cults are based on: I’m alone in my little box and I  have to go through this famous person’s personality before I can have a relationship with you, with my country, or with myself.

The reason this is relevant at this time, and one of the reasons that Donald Trump is powerful for so many people is that his personality makes whiteness fabulous.  Let me back up a bit.  America right now is like an alcoholic before entering recovery; these are our “crackhead” years. And I say that with confidence, because I have crack cocaine in my story. Part of what is happening to us is that our culture just can’t sustain whiteness as it once did.  Whatever you thought of the Obama administration politically, the Obamas as a black family living in the White House symbolized a very important change in this country in terms of access to power.  Whiteness, as we’ve always known it, was put on notice.

At its core, Donald Trump’s presidency is really a reaction to something, rather than an assertion of one man’s vision. It is inert and hollow at its core, which is why there is such a need for smoke and mirrors.  And also why he is so dangerous: he has a constant need to overcompensate, to shape-shift, to prove his power crudely, because there is no real leadership. Nothing he does seems to have anything to do with justice or basic decency, but what Donald Trump does do – and he does it spectacularly – is to make whiteness fun and entertaining for his masses. And in “whiteness” I include homophobia, patriarchy, gender bias, hostility towards the environment, unchecked greed for profit, and a deep suspicion of, and desire to annihilate, anyone perceived as “other”.  It’s not America he’s making great again, it’s whiteness; because whiteness as a construct is on its last legs and everybody knows it.

Now, if you have invested in whiteness your whole life, or believed or been told from birth that it makes you special in some way, you are going to be shocked when you try and withdraw money from that bank account and the teller tells you it’s been cleaned out.  The heartbreak is too much, the dislocation is too much.  You will either change and find a different premise on which to base your life, or you will go to a Trump rally and cheer.

The problem, again, is that our relationship with whiteness as a country is very similar to that of an addict in the throes of drug and alcohol addiction: you need more and more, and the more desperate you become, the more you need to numb yourself.  A society addicted to whiteness will eventually lead to full-on white supremacy and Nazism. It’s inevitable.  Germany chose whiteness after the shame they felt after World War I; and Donald Trump plays on our cultural shame – that we aren’t “winning” anymore.  That’s hard for us to hear as Americans, and it is especially hard for white American men.  What’s unfair is that Donald Trump won’t tell the full truth – we aren’t winning anymore, not because we’re losers but because the game changed, and it needed to change.

If that truth is too real to face, you may choose instead to feel outraged and cheated – and Donald Trump is the leader for that disaffected person.  That’s why we have all these mass-shootings.  In these men’s minds, I believe it is like going to one of those tacky traveling carnivals where you have to throw a ring around a goldfish bowl to win a stuffed animal. And you throw ring after ring until you realized it’s rigged; and when you finally do win, they change the rules on you and you don’t get the big, beautiful teddy bear you set your heart on, you get some piece of shit that probably costs less than the first dollar you spent to play.  Twenty dollars later, you feel tricked and stupid; you could have bought your own damned bear. White men feel they are playing the game as they have been taught, and that they aren’t winning any prizes. That’s how these men feel when they walk into a movie theater with an assault rifle.  They aren’t getting even with someone, they are getting even with the loss of a way of life.

I met a white man, college-educated, bright, who told me he voted for Trump because he was tired of seeing transgender people on television.  They are getting too much power, he said, they have their own talk-shows now; and, I surmised, he feels he doesn’t have any power.  These shootings are more than just random outbreaks of violence, they are deep acknowledgements of impotence and entitlement.  White men shooters are responsible for their actions, but in a profound way whiteness has warped all of us.  I’ll end this answer where I began: We are desperately sick as a country right now and we need to admit to ourselves that we need help.

In 2016, you wrote a piece called “The Cult of Whiteness: On Donald Trump, #OscarsSoWhite and the End of America”.  You mentioned cults in relationship to Donald Trump here, can you talk a little more about that? The day of our First Person Plural Reading Series event is also the 40th anniversary of the Jonestown massacre, November 18, 1978, the single most devasting event involving American deaths before the attack on the World Trade Center on 9/11.  Several years ago, I read most of the books I could find about Jonestown. I really wanted to understand what happened there, who these people were.  The first thing I decided after reading just one book was that I would never again use the phrase “drinking the Kool-Aid” to mean capitulation to another person or idea. There has been a cultural assumption about the people who died there; that they followed a religious leader to a remote part of a jungle – a majority of them people of color – and that this man, Jim Jones, told them all to kill themselves.  They said, “okay” because they were devoted to him, and hours later 909 lives were lost.  But that’s not how it went down at all.

If you read the history of Jim Jones and The People’s Temple, you will find that many of those people wanted to leave, but had no way out and were forced to take the cyanide at gunpoint.  There were unquestionably zealots within the group, but I believe the majority would have made a different choice if they hadn’t been conditioned over time and eventually forced to kill themselves.  We know the dynamics of what went on there from the incredible stories of the people who survived, and actual recordings.  What most of us don’t know is that many of the people who died there followed Jones to Guyana because they believed they could create a just society where the elderly were genuinely cared for, where racism and sexism didn’t exist, and where people came together from all social backgrounds to feed the hungry and provide health- and childcare.  Many of them had a vision to see real change in the world, and I believe that if they achieved any part of their goal – and the photographs of parishioners black and white, young and old laughing together, suggest they at some point they did – they can be an inspiration to us.  I want to honor those people and their vision here.

Jonestown is instructive because it shows how people can be manipulated by a charismatic leader, people who are often well-intentioned, into behaving in ways that are unfathomable.  And it happens by degrees. There will always be the crackpot in our society, the unbalanced person like the recent pipe bomber, whom we can dismiss as crazy. But it is also what is happening to us – the “regular” people.  We don’t see how easily we can one day become that pipe bomber.  Hitler is used as an example of evil so often that he becomes banal; he loses his power to horrify us anymore.  What fascinates me is not only the phenomenon of Hitler, but of the woman who lives a mile or two away from the concentration camp, who can see and smell the smoke from the ovens as she is putting out her laundry.  She isn’t a madwoman; she’s a mother, a sister, a best friend, a wife. The man who turns on the gas, used to be a farmer; he’s also a husband, a brother, a son.  How does evil become normalized for him? When did forcing people into the gas chamber become just another day at work?

These examples seem so extreme, something that happened to other people in a never-never land.  But when you visit Berlin and see the sign right outside Wittenbergerplatz train station, that reads, “Orte des Schreckens, die wir niemals vergessen dürfen …” (“Places of terror we must never forget”) and lists the Nazi concentration camps, you see why it is essential to remember.  We don’t have that same relationship to our own evil in this country.  We don’t have the daily reminders and awareness about slavery and lynching.  That makes us vulnerable. Last week the Senator from Mississippi, Cindy Hyde-Smith, made a joke about “public hangings” in an election in which she is running against a black candidate.  And she seems to be getting away with it. The consciousness just isn’t there.

Something is happening to us, right now, and we need to examine it carefully. Our myth about ourselves as Americans is that we are strong – and we are.   We are also impressionable, because all human beings are.  You hate the new apartment you have to move into because it’s smaller than your old place; you can’t stand it for the first two months, but eventually you put up some shelves, get some nice plants, put up a poster or two and you adjust.  You get used to it.  I think evil can be like that.  We turn on the news and find out that Jim Acosta has had his press pass taken away by the White House, or that John Brennan has had his security clearance revoked, and that there is retaliation against anyone who challenges or speaks out against this administration.  We’re horrified, of course.  But if the day comes when we turn on the news and say, “Oh, it’s about Jim Acosta again, it looks like they’ve locked him in jail this time”, and then turn to Netflix, we are in big trouble.  On some level, it is our civic duty to remained horrified by what is happening.  We need to stay determined that this never be okay with us.

What gives you hope these days? The online image which someone compiled of all the women of color newly elected to the House of Representatives.  The night of the elections, I focused too much on what I perceived as the main events, the governorships, and I was furious that Ted Cruz won again.  Sometimes you ask yourself, “Are we all watching the same news?  Are we seeing the same things in the world?” Clearly, we’re not.  I was so looking forward to not having to see that face or hear that voice again.   But I listened to people I respect celebrating the House wins, and while it wasn’t a blue “tidal” wave, it was a blue wave of a kind.   What it reveals is that there is resistance; that people are saying no to this administration.  And that is important.  I remember how we would often chant at rallies, “Tell me what democracy looks like!” And when I see those women, and the diversity represented in terms of sexual orientation, gender, race, cultural identity, I hear the response: “This is what democracy looks like!”

Max & BrookLast year I wrote about being inspired by my sister’s dog, this year I got a puppy, a labrador-shepherd mix, who recently turned ten months old.  She is extremely loving, deeply exasperating, indefatigable and hilarious – all at once.  It’s been an amazing adventure.  I’ve never had a lab before – I had no idea what I was getting into!  I posted a picture on Facebook of myself sitting in front of my computer, despairing about the latest Trump débâcle, and she jumped up on her hind legs and licked my face, as if to say, “Stop watching CNN and that horrible man and play with me this instant!”

I spoke last year at FFPS about drawing energy from nature; and while I still consider myself mostly a city boy, the more I get frustrated with politics, the more I return to the healing force of living things.  Nature, even when it is occasionally cruel, encourages empathy.  I’m in upstate New York some of the time, and there are trees so beautiful as they are shedding their leaves, you drive by and gasp.  Splashes of the deepest reds and yellows and bright orange. I think every person of color, every queer person, every woman – basically all those who are targeted by the White House – should have regular contact with nature and animals during this political season. I am very happy, for example, that my dog cannot watch FOX news, and that she hasn’t been conditioned by racism and has no idea who Ann Coulter is.  That’s purity. I may have to worry about Mike Pence trying to overturn gay marriage (and if he does, I’ll sue him for every penny of our wedding costs four years ago) but I don’t have to worry about our dog being homophobic – if she hates us it’s not political, it’s because we refuse to give her a treat. This is extremely important to my continuing mental health.  I’m observing people having mental breakdowns and being triggered for all kinds of abuse memories by this administration.  The injustice of the Kavanaugh hearings alone was enough to put even the sanest person into a psych ward. We need to find sources of sanity, of unconditional love.  So, I listen to NPR, feel depressed about life under Trump, and then go and look for our dog to find out what she’s tearing up now.  It works for us.

 

 

 

FPP Interview: Ricardo Hernandez

The silence of a family that crossed the border and must avoid detection.  The silence and elements of a poem the immigrant son negotiates in his work. This is a short interview with poet Ricardo Hernandez, but it will stay in your heart. Hear him read on Sunday, Nov. 18th at “What Just Happened: Writers Respond to Our American Crises” from 6-8pm at Silvana in Harlem with Ibrahim Abdul-Matin, Judith Baumel, Tanya Domi, Max S. Gordon, Ruby Shamir, and Vanessa K. Valdés!

IMG_1889In the very first line of your bio, you tell us you’re the son of Mexican immigrants. Tell us what your family experience, in this country, has meant for you and your writing. After crossing the border in ‘97, my family and I operated within a silence likely familiar to most undocumented folks: keep your gaze down; smile, but try not to speak; don’t ever make waves—the primary concern being, of course, avoiding detection. Even within our own home the code was enforced, and we never really discussed our fear of deportation. (Why, I’m still not sure, but it’s hard not to recognize it as a form of self-defense, as repression often is.)

In hindsight, I see similarities between that brand of silence and elements most poetries negotiate: silence; breath; an understanding of the value and menace of utterance. “Restrained” is how my MFA cohort often (lovingly) describes the language in my work, and I posit my and my family’s experience is tied to that: I grew up learning every word must be scrutinized, appraised for what it might elucidate and/or endanger.

Of course, it’s not all doom and gloom. Engaging with other writers, other poets, seeing how they envision their own writing has, in recent months, provided models of how I might reimagine my relationship to the medium. “It is a function of poetry to locate those zones inside us that would be free and declare them so,” wrote the late C.D. Wright. I wholeheartedly agree.

Is there a poem– yours or someone else’s–that really speaks to your experiences these days? I’m a circuitous reader, revisiting the same four or five poems from the same poet for long (and I mean LONG) stretches of time; long-distance apprenticeships, is how I’ve come to imagine it. At the moment, Rita Dove’s Horse & Tree is orbiting my mind (and I urge you to listen to her reading it online). I’m in awe of its deftness, its clarity, how it manages to explain life (but really, aging and death) without razing the reader.

I lost someone recently, and I’ve been trying to understand that loss as best I can. This poem helps.

When do you feel most “we”? When do you feel most “I”? The most we: with other writers, other poets. At this moment, that means amongst my MFA cohort, whether that be in workshop/class, at a bar after workshop (shout-outs to Veronica), or  just sharing birth charts and candids in group texts.

The most I: commuting. The subway always feels like such a lonely domain.

What Just Happened? Writers Respond to Our American Crises

Join us on Sunday, November 18th at Silvana in Harlem for an evening of politics, culture, and history featuring writers Ibrahim Abdul-Matin, Judith Baumel, Tanya Domi, Max S. Gordon, Ricardo Hernandez, Ruby Shamir, and Vanessa K.Valdés. This is our third year hosting a post-election reading and if we can judge by the two prior readings, this one will be special. You’ll leave energized. The reading is from 6-8pm. Silvana is located at 300 W. 116th St near Frederick Douglass Blvd. Admission is free. There will be cake!

ibrahim headshot (1) (1)-2Ibrahim Abdul-Matin is an author, radio contributor, and environmental policy consultant. He has appeared on FOX News, Al-Jazeera, ABC News, and contributed to “The Takeaway.” As a writer, he’s appeared in The Washington Post, CNN.com, The Daily Beast, GOOD Magazine, ColorLines, Wiretap and Elan Magazine. His is the author of the book “Green Deen: What Islam Teaches About Protecting the Planet” and contributor to All-American: 45 American Men On Being Muslim. He is a former sustainability policy advisor to New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and member of the founding team of the Brooklyn Academy for Science and the Environment. He currently serves as the Director of Community Affairs at the New York City Department of Environmental Protection and on the board of the International Living Future Institute. Ibrahim earned a BA in History and Political Science from University of Rhode Island and a master’s in public administration from Baruch College, City University of New York.

PotraitJudy-2

 

Judith Baumel is a poet, critic and translator. A recent Fulbright Fellow in Italy at the University of Genoa, she is Professor of English and Founding Director of the Creative Writing Program at Adelphi University. She served as president of the Association of Writers and Writing Programs.  Her books of poetry are The Weight of Numbers, Now, and The Kangaroo Girl.

 

 

DOMI_A (002) Vlodkowsky originalTanya Domi is an Adjunct Assistant Professor of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University and a faculty affiliate of the Harriman Institute where she teaches human rights and international relations in the Western Balkans. Prior to joining the faculty in 2008, Domi served in the U.S. Army for 15 years and later worked for the late Congressman Frank McCloskey (D-IN-8), serving as his defense policy analyst in the early 1990s during the run-up to the Bosnian war. Domi was seconded by the U.S. State Department to the OSCE Mission to Bosnia and Herzegovina 1996-2000 and served as Spokesperson, Counselor to the Head of Mission and Chair of the OSCE Media Experts Commission. Domi has worked in a dozen countries, including Kosovo, Montenegro and Serbia regarding democratic, economic, media and political transitional development, as well as human rights and gender/sexual identity issues. Domi is a widely published author and journalist whose work has appeared in The New York Times, The Atlantic Magazine, Al Jazeera America, The Christian Science Monitor, The Balkanist, Balkan Insight, Radio Free Europe and The Institute for War and Peace Reporting. She is a graduate of Central Michigan University where she obtained a Bachelor of Arts degree in Journalism and Political Science in 1982 and earned a Masters of Arts degree at Columbia University in Human Rights in 2007. She is currently writing a book on the LGBTI human rights movement in the Western Balkans.

Maxie picMax S. Gordon is a writer and performer. He has been published in the anthologies Inside Separate Worlds: Life Stories of Young Blacks, Jews and Latinos (University of Michigan Press, 1991), Go the Way Your Blood Beats: An Anthology of African-​American Lesbian and Gay Fiction (Henry Holt, 1996). His work has also appeared on openDemocracy, Democratic Underground and Truthout, in Z Magazine, Gay Times, and other progressive on-​line and print magazines in the U.S. and internationally. His essays include “Bill Cosby, Himself, Fame, Narcissism and Sexual Violence”“A Different World: Why We Owe The Cosby Accusers An Apology”, “Resist Trump: A Survival Guide”, and “Family Feud: Jay-Z, Beyoncé and the Desecration of Black Art”

RicardoHernandez-2

 

Ricardo Hernandez is the son of Mexican immigrants. A recipient of fellowships from Lambda Literary and Poets House, his work has appeared most recently in The OffingFoundry, and The Los Angeles Review of Books. He’s an MFA candidate at Rutgers-Newark.

 

 

3019488Ruby Shamir is an award-winning author, a ghostwriter, an adaptor of adult non-fiction for children, and a literary researcher based in New York City.  She’s performed research, editorial planning, editing, and writing for many high profile non-fiction best-sellers, including books by Hillary Clinton, Chelsea Clinton, Sonia Sotomayor, and Tom Brokaw.  Her work as a ghost-writer has been reviewed as “lyrical,” “eloquent,” “winning,” “thoughtful,” “personal and appealing.” To The Moon, her middle grade adaptation of Jeffrey Kluger’s Apollo 8, received a starred review from the School Library Journal.  Shamir writes a series of picture books on American history and civics.  What’s the Big Deal About Elections came out last August to favorable reviewsWhat’s the Big Deal About First Ladies, (Philomel, 2017) received a starred review from Kirkus Reviews.  That book and What’s the Big Deal About Freedom (Philomel, 2017) were chosen for the International Literacy Association Children’s Choice Award list.  Her public policy and political experience includes working for three and a half years in the Clinton White House and leading Hillary Rodham Clinton’s New York Senate office as well as policy development work for the AFL-CIO and writing coaching for the marketing department at IBM.

AVQ6XXce4_b7Wav1dCqBNUZCEnlvmfxzvUKVCHph650 (1) (1)Born and raised here in New York City, Vanessa K. Valdés is an associate professor at The City College of New York. In addition to the languages of Spanish and Portuguese, she teaches on the African diaspora in the Americas, that is, the histories and literatures of Black peoples in Latin America, including Brazil, and the Caribbean, and their communities here in the United States. Her most recent book is Diasporic Blackness: The Life and Times of Arturo Alfonso Schomburg (2017): it is the first to situate Mr. Schomburg squarely within his Black Latinx identity.

This Thursday at McNally Jackson: Joshua Rivkin in Conversation with Stacy Parker Le Melle

42982617_10155415377971735_6583150366060183552_nThis Thursday (10/18) come hear acclaimed author Joshua Rivkin read from Chalk: The Art and Erasure of Cy Twombly at McNally Jackson Soho bookstore on 52 Prince Street at 7pm. After his reading he will be in conversation with First Person Plural Reading Series curator Stacy Parker Le Melle. They share a special connection: both taught creative writing to children at Houston’s Menil Collection, home of the Cy Twombly Gallery. Come hear and buy this book that its starred Kirkus Review called “impeccably researched, lavishly and lovingly written, insightful and discerning…a joy to read.”

Please join us Thursday in Soho! Click here for the the full Kirkus review.

We had a FIRE Season Opener!

7E22018A-4A12-4AD3-B046-0887D7690910Thank you Gregory PardloLacy JohnsonAmy Fusselman, and Maya Doig-Acuña
for what you brought to that room. Simply amazing. See you guys on Sunday, November 18th for the next First Person Plural reading. Announcement coming soon!

FPP Interview: Maya Doig-Acuña

11070980_10152853254607479_7831570190438410890_nYou’ve written profoundly about the Afro-Latinidad experience in Brooklyn. What are current issues or dynamics that concern you now? What has pulled you to write about your identity and community? I’m drawn to writing about Afro-Latinidad, and about Brooklyn, because Toni [Morrison] told us to write what we’ve always wanted to read. I think writing helps me make sense of the questions I’ve long grappled with – about Blackness, and the mutability of identity, and how home makes us (& how we make home). Also Jacqueline Woodson was my favorite writer when I was a kid and she writes about Brooklyn as though it’s a character; that approach resonated with me deeply. So I try to write about BK with a similar level of care.

When do you feel most “we”? When do you feel most “I”? I feel most “we” when I imagine history as a living thing with which we’re still in conversation. Community is the people we build with now, the people we love on now, but it can also be our ancestors, it can also be multigenerational. I feel most “I” when I’m in my apartment, listening to the same songs over and over again, cooking food the way I like it, indulging in those things that are specific to me.

Tell us about your Harlem. I think it’s been important for me to understand that Harlem is not mine. I spend most of my time here, but – I think because I’m from Brooklyn, which has seen such robust gentrification – I’m skeptical about the claims we make to place, and to a community. I don’t believe I have a claim to Harlem. I’m grateful to live in a neighborhood with this legacy of Black artistry and movement-building and cultural survival. But I also see a commodification of that legacy, packaged for new folks who don’t necessarily share any intimacy with it. So I’ve been trying to figure out my relationship to Harlem, as a New Person.

Who are writers that we should be reading right now?  This is a tough question for me because I feel like there are a million awesomely talented writers we should all definitely be reading but who I’m not yet familiar with. Still, here are some of the writers with work in my Amazon cart right now: Yrsa Daley-Ward, Kiese Laymon, Solmaz Sharif, Jamel Brinkley, and Eve Ewing. On a cultural commentary front, I’ve been reading lots of Doreen St. Felix (The New Yorker), and Hannah Giorgis (The Atlantic).

What urgent advice would you offer emerging writers? I’m still very much emerging! I guess what I try to remind myself is: don’t stake your value as a person on the reception of your work in public.

Come to Silvana on Sunday, September 30th for the FPP Season Opener!

Welcome to our sixth year of showcasing literary and artistic excellence in Harlem, USA! I’m thrilled to announce our season opener with three alumni returning with new books and an emerging essayist! Pulitzer-prize winner Gregory Pardlo, Lacy Johnson, Amy Fusselman, and Maya Doig-Acuña will be reading on Sunday, September 30th at Silvana in Harlem from 6:00pm-8:00pm. 300 W 116th St (SW corner of 116th and Frederick Douglass Blvd). Admission is free! Cash bar and dining – but there will be cake! Here is more information about our amazing participants:

Maya_Doig-Acuna HeadshotMaya Doig-Acuña is a native Brooklynite and graduate of Middlebury College. She is
the nonfiction editor of new literary publication, Double Space Magazine, and has been published herself in Harlem Focus, Latino Rebels, and Duende Literary Journal. She has also received support from Bread Loaf School of English and Tin House Workshop. As a Smithsonian Cultural Heritage Fellow, Maya is currently at work on an oral history project on Black immigrant communities in Washington, D.C. She is a lover of feelings and television shows that make people cry.

IMG_0699 (1)

Amy Fusselman is the author of four books of nonfiction. Her latest is Idiophone, about which Publisher’s Weekly noted that Fusselman “has transformed the traditional essay into something far wilder and more alive.” Her writing has appeared in The New York TimesThe Washington Post, The Believer, Ms, McSweeney’s, ARTnews, and many other places. She lives in Manhattan with her husband and three children. 

This is Amy’s return appearance at FPP!

 

4K7A7030-Edit color

Lacy M. Johnson is a Houston-based professor, curator, activist, and is author of the essay collection The Reckonings (Scribner, 2018), the widely-acclaimed memoir The Other Side (Tin House, 2014), and Trespasses (University of Iowa Press, 2012). She teaches creative nonfiction at Rice University and is the Founding Director of the Houston Flood Museum.

This is Lacy’s return appearance at FPP!

 

Pardlo-author-photo

Gregory Pardlo’s ​collection​ Digest (Four Way Books) won the 2015 Pulitzer Prize for Poetry. His other honors​ include fellowships from the Guggenheim Foundation, the National Endowment for the Arts and the New York Foundation for the Arts; his first collection Totem was selected by Brenda Hillman for the APR/Honickman Prize in 2007. He is Poetry Editor of Virginia Quarterly ReviewAir Traffic, a memoir in essays, was released by Knopf in April.

This is Greg’s return appearance at FPP!

– Stacy Parker Le Melle

 

 

FPP Interview: Cynthia Manick

FPP spoke with Cynthia Manick via email about her new self-portrait poems, being buried in the Schomburg stacks, Beyonce‘s dance to “Everybody Mad” and much more! Come to Silvana on Monday, April 30th, and hear Manick read with Dennis Norris IIJennifer Baker, and Sarah Perry. Silvana is located at 300 W. 116th St., near Frederick Douglass Blvd, on the SW corner. Take the B/C to 116th and you’re there. 6-8pm. There will be cake!

manick2Tell us about your current work. A recent teacher asked what is the other voice of your silence? How do you disassemble fear? The poems I’m writing now deals with the body, home, and silence in different spaces. It explores the parts of our self we share readily, and those we don’t share at all. I’m currently writing a suite of self-portrait poems because as a black person, woman, sister, friend, daughter, girlfriend, poet, and more, I exist on different registers. I’m also working on disassembling fear by exploring joy. Poetry doesn’t have to be steeped in pain, there’s joy to celebrate as well. That joy could be poems about Marvel’s Luke Cage or by exploring the intimacy of a kiss.

You founded and curate your own reading series Soul Sisters Revue. What do you find most rewarding about having your own series? Soul Sister Revue was founded to honor the tradition of storytelling. I also wanted to create a space for people of color and for established and emerging poets to read in a shared space. The most rewarding part is the night of the performance and hearing a culmination of voices. I know that I’ve curated well, if I see everyone active listening and ignoring their phones. But lately people have been doing Instagram stories of the readings, so that’s also a good feeling. I like that they want to take the Soul Sister experience with them. It’s also rewarding to connect to the readers themselves. Sometimes I’ll read work in a literary magazine and I’m so moved that I’ll email that person directly (if they’re local) and invite them to be a part of the series.

Tell us about your Harlem. When I think of Harlem I first picture the Schomburg and its pictures of the Harlem Renaissance. In college I double majored in English and Philosophy and my English thesis focused on literature of the Harlem Renaissance. So I spent a couple of months buried in the Schomburg stacks and requesting pictures of the Savoy, Cotton Club, and the rare texts they inspired. Harlem has such a proud history as a Black Mecca and when I travel there today, I see pockets of that pride.  Harlem also makes me think of basketball courts on 125th and guys giving the game their all; hair salons with really good braiders if you’re willing to travel; and performers rubbing the tree on stage at the Apollo.

If you could share one poem of yours with all of America, what would it be? I’m going to cheat because there’s a tie between two poems. The short poem “Middle Passage” speaks to America’s past built on slavery, so the epigraph reads “for the ancestors of little black girls” because we can’t go forward without recognizing the past; its good and bad. I actually read that poem when I perform in a new space. The second poem is “Things I Will Tell My Children About Destiny” because it looks towards the future and what’s possible.

Screen Shot 2018-04-25 at 6.29.09 PMWhat should we be reading, viewing, or listening to right now? Beside Beyonce‘s dance to “Everybody Mad” at Coachella (which is my current obsession), I’ve actually started to rewatch “Things I Carry Into The World” which is 3 minute film based on my poem that is on TIDAL in celebration of National Poetry Month. I hadn’t seen it in a while, so I’m rediscovering it all over again. I’ve been listening to the Gettin Grown podcast, where two black women talk about the honest difficulties in adulting; the Commonplace Podcast which is conversations with poets; and to Thirst Aid Kit, a hilarious podcast about thirsting outloud over stars like Oscar Issac and Mahershala Ali. I also recommend Women of Resistance: Poems for New Feminism edited by Danielle BarnhartAnother Way To Say Enter by Amanda Johnston, and Don’t Call Us Dead by Danez Smith. On my to-read list is  black/Maybe by Roberto Carlos Garcia and Blood Vinyls by Yolanda J. Franklin.

FPP Interview: Jennifer Baker

Baker_Headshot_2014FPP spoke with Jennifer Baker via email about her new anthology, her advocacy in publishing, and much more! Come to Silvana on Monday, April 30th, and hear Baker read with Dennis Norris II, Cynthia Manick, and Sarah Perry. Silvana is located at 300 W. 116th St., near Frederick Douglass Blvd, on the SW corner. Take the B/C to 116th and you’re there. 6-8pm.

Everyday People-The Color of LifeTell us about your current work. Currently I’m a contributing editor for Electric Literature and do a podcast called Minorities in Publishing and I do write fiction/nonfiction on various topics of interest that don’t always hinge on race per se. At the moment though I am prepping for a bunch of publicity for the all PoC/Indigenous short story anthology I edited, Everyday People: The Color of Life, coming out with Atria Books on August 28th. It’s an honor to have so many wonderful and stupendously talented folks involved, including fellow reader Dennis Norris II. They’re all fab and I’m super proud of this anthology.

You have been a tireless advocate for representation in the publishing world. Could you tell us what inspired you to speak up, and what you’re accomplishing? Well, that’s a long story, but I think essentially recognizing more of what’s been happening in the world and expanding my own world as a woman of color with privilege allows me to see things in a much clearer light. I really do understand why people chose ignorance because there is a bliss to it in not having to think too hard or at all about the issues affecting so many and the work (both internal and external) that needs to be done. However, there’s comfort in knowing there’s a contribution being made to see things change in the positive and not necessarily to maintain status quo. It’s refreshing to see so many invested in that and to be part of that means continual growth, as an artist, as an editor, and as a person in general. I can say that having family who saw the KKK up close and hearing more of those stories has made me further attuned to the need to speak out. Silence can equal death for many people so my silence is not at all a prism of ambivalence that I want to be held within any longer. My voice is my strongest asset as I’ve learned.

If you could share one piece of your writing with all of America, what would it be? Why? At this point much of my writing is pretty available digitally. But perhaps it would be a short story I’m working on that’s speculative in nature about what we do, especially as Americans, with people we don’t want to deal with anymore. How easily we’ll let others do our dirty laundry to relieve ourselves of responsibility. Pretty freaky if I can get everything in play.

What should we be reading, viewing, or listening to right now? I’ve read some amazing work in the past few months which I feel very lucky about including The Poet X by Elizabeth Acevedo, Tradition by Brendan Kiely, What it Means When a Man Falls from The Sky by Lesley Nneka Arimah, and currently reading MEM by Bethany Morrow which comes out next month. I’m also looking forward to sitting with Nafissa Thompson-Spires debut Heads of the Colored People as well as Reese Kwon’s The Incendiaries and a bunch of new anthologies coming out from Roxane Gay, Ellen Oh & Elsie Chapman, and Glory Edim!

FPP Interview: Dennis Norris II

IMG_20170304_200606_975FPP spoke with Dennis Norris II via email about his new work, surprises encountered creating the FOOD 4 THOT podcast, the “multiple spirits” within, and so much more. Come to Silvana on Monday, April 30th, and hear Norris read with Jennifer Baker, Cynthia Manick, and Sarah Perry. Silvana is located at 300 W. 116th St., near Frederick Douglass Blvd, on the SW corner. Take the B/C to 116th and you’re there. 7pm.

Tell us about their current work. Currently I’m trying to hunker down and focus on rounding those final corners with the novel I’ve been working on for the past 6 years. All I will really say is that it deals with fathers and sons, boyhood, race, sex and sexual identity, and the question of how we reconcile our childhoods with the futures we’ve chosen for ourselves. It’s tentatively titled “When The Harvest Comes” and when August 28th arrives, you’ll be able to read an excerpt from it under the title “Last Rites” in the anthology “Everyday People: The Color of Life” which is forthcoming from the Atria Books imprint of Simon and Schuster. The anthology’s brilliant editor, Jennifer Baker, really did her thing putting that book together!

IMG_20170216_130836_785They co-host an amazing podcast FOOD 4 THOT. What has been rewarding about this? What has surprised them? It’s definitely been a surprise to learn how much work goes into producing a podcast. It’s a really incredible amount of writing and editing, and producing, in order to make a high quality product. What has also been surprising is the reception of F4T! I don’t think we ever could’ve expected it to take off the way it has, to yield as many opportunities as it has. It’s given me a real lesson on the ways in which social media can really help my career.

The greatest rewards by far are the dick pics the fans send. Kidding! That’s a joke! By far it’s seeing the engagement that listeners have with the show on social media, and the many ways we’re beginning to understand that we’ve done a good job of taking our little 4-person community and opening it up to others who’re in need of queer brown community, and given it to them when they have none, or very little. That’s what keeps us going in the face of the challenges and all the work it takes—the listeners, who’ve made it very clear that there’s a need for our voices, and that we’re able to add a little joy and levity to people’s lives.

What are their earliest memories of Harlem? What is Harlem today for them? My relationship to Harlem is quite young. Although I’ve always had family in Harlem, we’d usually see each other at holidays in South Carolina, where that side of my family originates. As a kid I came to NYC often to visit my older sister, but she was living in Brooklyn. So it wasn’t until I started working in Harlem in 2013, at the Harlem Children’s Zone, that I really began to form a relationship with this community, this place. I love it here, it’s the closest thing to a Black Mecca that I’ve ever experienced, and it’s a place where art and literature have a long history, which is really affirming when you’re just starting out as a writer. Also, working at HCZ, I met and became part of a team of some of the most brilliant black emerging writers of the day. We’re all on the verge of, or already are, doing great things, and it feels a bit like a resurgence, and we all met under one employer at one moment in time. I’m thinking of writer and educator Erica Buddington, recent Whiting Award Winner and poet Rickey Laurentiis, and recent Buzzfeed Emerging Writer Fellow Fred McKindra, among others. So today, when I think of Harlem, I think of the place that brought me into this incredible family of brilliant black activists, educators, intellectuals, writers, and artists.

When do they feel most “we” and most “I”? Do they? I’ve recently adopted the gender neutral pronoun They as my preferred pronoun, after much consideration. Although I’m perfect happy to answer to She or He. I’ve given this much thought and for me it has to do with the fact that I contain multitudes across an array of layers. There are a few, very loving, very well-meaning people in my life who are having trouble adjusting to my use of the word They because of the notion that it’s grammatically incorrect. But for me, it’s actually grammatically perfect because while I am only one person, I feel as though in this area of my existence I have multiple identities. Or perhaps spirits better personifies this. Multiple spirits. And so I need a pronoun that reflects multiplicity. But in this, I also feel very singularly and staunchly me, myself. I. Because this is me I’m talking about, and no one else. Not sure if that makes sense to anyone else but it does to me.

If they could share one piece of their writing with all of America, what would it be? Why? Oh I don’t know. There’s a story in my chapbook called “Among Shadows, Passing” that I’m extremely proud of. It took 7 years to get published and pre-dates literally all of my other published work. I wrote it the week my father died and it was the first really good story I ever wrote.

Screen Shot 2018-04-23 at 8.33.49 PMWhat should we be reading, viewing, or listening to right now? I’m honestly still
stuck on “Anti”, “Lemonade”, and “A Seat At The Table”, but Cardi B is killing it too. If you’re a jazz fan, my sister and her husband Jean and Marcus Baylor of The Baylor Project were nominated for 2 Grammys this year for their debut album “The Journey.” It’s absolutely transcendent.

I’m really excited about the incredible essay collection “How To Write an Autobiographical Novel” by Alexander Chee. And my friend Tommy Pico recently sent me a link to a clip of two women, Jully Black and Jeanne Beker discussing indigenous rights on Canada Reads. At one point the debate gets heated and Jeanne, who is white, says to Jully who is black, “Why are you attacking me? I feel like you’re attacking me.” And Jully has the best response I’ve ever seen to a white liberal who feels attacked during a difficult conversation with an unflinching person of color. She says, “…whatever you’re feeling, take it to the alter. Because I’m not the one that’s responsible for your feelings.” That moment needs to be broadcast all over America on loop, I’d say. We all need to be reminded of this, on the daily. Myself included.